Feed aggregator
Faculty GUR Group: Brad Howard, "Media Policy, Media Practice (Part 2)"
The Sound of Cells Dividing
Winter Advising & Registration 2010
The Corporal's Diary
Thank You, Whatcom County Parks Department!
Hey lurkers! Have any of you heard of the new park that just opened in Birch Bay? It’s called Point Whitehorn Marine Reserve, and it is beautiful.
I went on a little adventure there today with a friend, and it was probably the most gorgeous park I’ve been to in the county. I’m almost afraid to blog about it because it’s so peaceful and pristine. You know the epic forests in films like Lord of the Rings — the kind that metal bands like to take black and white photographs of to use for album covers? Imagine a little slice of a forest like that tenderly woven into the landscape of a lovely corner of Birch Bay, complete with a conveniently paved trail and absolutely stunning lookout points. At the end of the (quite short) trail, hikers can take a brief trek down to the tidal flats below, which I cannot recommend enough!
This was the perfect adventure for a sunny autumn afternoon, and an ideal trail for those who want to be enveloped by nature’s enchantments without having to commit to a session of hardcore hiking (I include myself in that category, though I enjoy a good hike sometimes). The water below was clear and magnificent, perfectly reflecting a fiery sunset… this is the stuff dreams are made of, lurkers.
So you may be wondering, “How do I get there if it’s all the way out in Blaine?” The easiest way to is carpool to the convenient parking area and go from there. If you want to get there using alternative transit, WTA’s Bus 55 can drop you off a few miles from the park. It’s probably best to bike out from there, but it could be a really lovely walk if you’re up for it! If you’re 55-ing it, you’ll want to go early in the day to have enough time to explore before the bus stops running. More specific directions can be found at the park’s homepage.
All I have to say is, thank you Whatcom County Parks Department for my new favorite adventure destination!
let minors drink! alcohol industry execs aren't rich enough!
So I took a few minutes and came up with a few points (originally posted here) that I feel are pretty valid:
The argument that "18yr olds can't make smart decisions to save their lives" is not valid from a civil rights standpoint.
If we're taking 18 as the legal age of "adulthood" where one is legally responsible for his or her own actions then the current drinking age is a blatant violation of the rights of 18-20yr olds. How can we logically deny rights to minors when they are still required to hold complete legal autonomy and responsibility?
The thought that "underagers just want to lower the drinking age so they can binge drink" is ridiculous.
Another Western student wrote: "How many poeple ... are thinking they want to be legally able to go buy a beer once in a while. Most [minors] want it to be legal so they can kill brain cells." Uh. Lies? It would be incredibly easy for me, as a minor, to get a half-gallon of hard alcohol, head out to a party on Friday, start chugging, and not remember what happened when I woke up Saturday morning. In fact, I bet you can find a thousand or so underage Bellinghamsters that do this weekly. The shitty thing? I can binge drink easy. If I want to have a drink with dinner at a restaurant then I'm S.O.L.
The only reason I personally want the drinking age lowered is so that I can have a pint of micro-brew at Boundary Bay along with my grilled portabellos.
"Lowering the drinking age would increase consumption of alcohol in the 18-20yr old population" might be true...
...but any increase would be in the form of responsible, public drinking like going out to a bar or having an alcoholic drink at a restaurant (both activities that can be easily supervised and controlled, unlike underage partying). The level of "party drinking" or binge drinking in minors is already pretty high and minors know how and where to get alcohol from. Making it easy for minors to obtain alcohol won't increase binge drinking, they/we already seem to do a good amount of that.
In the college setting, especially on-campus, the problems of the drinking age are only magnified.
Even after the first few weeks underage students learn that drinking on campus will get them in some deep s**t. Does this enforcement of the drinking age reduce consumption in minors like it is intended to? Hell no. It just throws them into riskier and more dangerous settings! Minors leave campus, go to parties where binge drinking (5+ drinks in a night) in encouraged, if not required. Returning to campus at the end of the night, instead of staying the night in a possibly risky setting, can STILL get students in trouble since public universities are still required to uphold and enforce state and federal laws. The result? Students are encouraged to sleep off-campus in (possibly) unfamiliar and relatively unsafe locations. Who is this supposed to benefit, again?
Myth: Letting minors drink is encouraging dangerous behavior.
Another student wrote, "I don't even understand why all you teenagers are so anxious to start drinking. Don't they teach you about the dangers of drinking in high school... While you’re at it, why don't you have unprotected sex with many partners so you can have the responsibility of caring for a child and dealing with STD's if you think your so f***ing grown up." This made me laugh and might be the worst argument for keeping the 21yr drinking age. It is not the governments job to "protect" the population from themselves. This argument suggests that we outlaw unprotected sex, criminalize the smoking of tobacco, reenact prohibition, enforce mandatory mass-transit to keep bad drivers off the road so they can't kill themselves, and require a 10pm bedtime so that nobody suffers from unhealthy sleep deprivation. Anyone over 18 is legally an adult and SHOULD NOT be withheld any rights given to the 'of-age' population.
I am definitely open to counter arguments, here. I do feel that 18 is kind of young as I think it will have the trickle-effect and increase availability of alcohol to high schoolers, but on the other hand I strongly believe that the civil rights of the 18-20yr old population are being blatantly violated. Your thoughts?
let minors drink! alcohol industry execs aren't rich enough!
So I took a few minutes and came up with a few points (originally posted here) that I feel are pretty valid:
The argument that "18yr olds can't make smart decisions to save their lives" is not valid from a civil rights standpoint.
If we're taking 18 as the legal age of "adulthood" where one is legally responsible for his or her own actions then the current drinking age is a blatant violation of the rights of 18-20yr olds. How can we logically deny rights to minors when they are still required to hold complete legal autonomy and responsibility?
The thought that "underagers just want to lower the drinking age so they can binge drink" is ridiculous.
Another Western student wrote: "How many poeple ... are thinking they want to be legally able to go buy a beer once in a while. Most [minors] want it to be legal so they can kill brain cells." Uh. Lies? It would be incredibly easy for me, as a minor, to get a half-gallon of hard alcohol, head out to a party on Friday, start chugging, and not remember what happened when I woke up Saturday morning. In fact, I bet you can find a thousand or so underage Bellinghamsters that do this weekly. The shitty thing? I can binge drink easy. If I want to have a drink with dinner at a restaurant then I'm S.O.L.
The only reason I personally want the drinking age lowered is so that I can have a pint of micro-brew at Boundary Bay along with my grilled portabellos.
"Lowering the drinking age would increase consumption of alcohol in the 18-20yr old population" might be true...
...but any increase would be in the form of responsible, public drinking like going out to a bar or having an alcoholic drink at a restaurant (both activities that can be easily supervised and controlled, unlike underage partying). The level of "party drinking" or binge drinking in minors is already pretty high and minors know how and where to get alcohol from. Making it easy for minors to obtain alcohol won't increase binge drinking, they/we already seem to do a good amount of that.
In the college setting, especially on-campus, the problems of the drinking age are only magnified.
Even after the first few weeks underage students learn that drinking on campus will get them in some deep s**t. Does this enforcement of the drinking age reduce consumption in minors like it is intended to? Hell no. It just throws them into riskier and more dangerous settings! Minors leave campus, go to parties where binge drinking (5+ drinks in a night) in encouraged, if not required. Returning to campus at the end of the night, instead of staying the night in a possibly risky setting, can STILL get students in trouble since public universities are still required to uphold and enforce state and federal laws. The result? Students are encouraged to sleep off-campus in (possibly) unfamiliar and relatively unsafe locations. Who is this supposed to benefit, again?
Myth: Letting minors drink is encouraging dangerous behavior.
Another student wrote, "I don't even understand why all you teenagers are so anxious to start drinking. Don't they teach you about the dangers of drinking in high school... While you’re at it, why don't you have unprotected sex with many partners so you can have the responsibility of caring for a child and dealing with STD's if you think your so f***ing grown up." This made me laugh and might be the worst argument for keeping the 21yr drinking age. It is not the governments job to "protect" the population from themselves. This argument suggests that we outlaw unprotected sex, criminalize the smoking of tobacco, reenact prohibition, enforce mandatory mass-transit to keep bad drivers off the road so they can't kill themselves, and require a 10pm bedtime so that nobody suffers from unhealthy sleep deprivation. Anyone over 18 is legally an adult and SHOULD NOT be withheld any rights given to the 'of-age' population.
I am definitely open to counter arguments, here. I do feel that 18 is kind of young as I think it will have the trickle-effect and increase availability of alcohol to high schoolers, but on the other hand I strongly believe that the civil rights of the 18-20yr old population are being blatantly violated. Your thoughts?
